Department of Art and Archaeology · 105 McCormick Hall · Princeton University · Princeton, NJ 08544-1018 USA
lecture series

2007

Commemorative Landscape Painting in China

mosqueMonday, 2 April 2007
Thursday, 5 April 2007
Anne Clapp
Professor Emerita, Wellesley College
Tang Center Lecture Series
4:30PM, 106 McCormick Hall
Monday, 2 April 2007 4:30 PM, 101 McCormick Hall
Conspicuous Seclusion: Commemorative Landscape Painting in China
Commemorative landscape painting is distinguished from the monumental painting that preceded it in Song by the intention to celebrate a particular historical person, to make known his creditable achievements, and to win social status and recognition. This is an art of disguised portraiture in which the subject asserts himself, his ambition, and tastes, openly seeking acceptance and support from his peers. The value system of the literati social structure was so familiar to its members that the individual could address his audience through pictorial biography just as he had through literary biography for centuries. The setting for such pictures is always natural landscape, interpreted in many different moods and forms, but the landscape is secondary to the man, and its true function is to mirror him as the humanistic ideal of the recluse-scholar. The literary baggage attached to the new landscape increased during the Yuan dynasty, when the first commemorative paintings appeared, and flourished through the Ming, producing an art form that was simultaneously pictorial and verbal. This art was a direct descendant of the "social biography" of the past —eulogies, poems, prefaces—communicating personal experience to other men. It was also a direct descendent of Song and Yuan landscape styles now turned into a new world.
Thursday, 5 April 2007 4:30 PM, 101 McCormick Hall
"What is in a Name?": The Biehao 別號 Painting in Chinese Landscape
A sub-type of commemorative painting concerned the biehao picture, name picture, which has much to say about the subjective nature of Chinese painting in the later dynasties. Chinese men had several names for use in different circumstances—family, formal, legal, and social. The biehao was a brush name, sobriquet, the only name he chose himself, and was chosen for reasons which only he knew. It was intended to set him apart from others, to convey something about him which was private and personal but which, nevertheless, the owner desired to be known to his class at large. It might be poetic, allusive, ironic, fanciful in many ways, but it was often concretely figurative and so could be illustrated in visual form. The earliest biehao paintings appear in the Yuan dynasty and reached their peak of popularity among Suzhou art patrons in the Ming dynasty. They flourished at a time when literati circles deplored literal illustration and sniffed at realism. They escaped both by hiding the identity of the owner in the colophons attached to the painting, one of which was a preface (xu) or explanation (bian) divulging the owner's identity and explaining how he acquired his hao. The picture was constructed around a conundrum from the start and afforded the patron and painter both ample opportunity for the play of wit, irony, double meanings, and other anomalies more often associated with the world than with the image.
Registration
There is no registration fee, but advance registration for the symposium is recommended. Space is limited. Reservations will be accepted in the order they are received.
Use our online registration form or, to register by telephone, call Andrea Stearly at (609) 258-1741

2003

Three Lectures on Chinese Art History
Wen Fong, Emeritus, Princeton University
In this special three-part lecture series, Wen C. Fong will present his current work on a new book on Chinese art history for the general reader. In his volume focused on Chinese painting and calligraphy, he analyzes the visual language developed by Chinese artists and offers interpretations of such a language within the Chinese cultural context.
Although Chinese painting and calligraphy have often been considered as the cultural “Other” from a Western perspective or as less valuable compared to the documentary evidence of written texts from a Sinological perspective, Wen Fong will demonstrate instead how the study of Chinese painting and calligraphy can provide deep insight into Chinese culture. He will discuss issues of style and expressive content from the Chinese art-historical perspective to offer fresh possibilities of criticism distinct from Western art historiography.
Cosponsored by the Tang Center for East Asian Art, the Department of Art and Archaeology, the Princeton University Art Museum with support from the Freeman Foundation, and the East Asian Studies Program.